Fixed and random effects models
By Matthew J. Gurka, G. Kelley, Lloyd J. Edwards. 2012
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94c06835f1b16ef08b2842083f07c7944d54174f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Gary W. Giumetti
- Amber N. Schroeder
- Robin M. Kowalski
- Carol Chu
- Megan L. Rogers
- Micah R. Lattanner
- Johannes Knoll
- Raymond P. Tucker
Citations in the corpus
- The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research (2017, methodology): “Random effects models were utilized since we anticipated that effect sizes would vary across studies and this model approach allows for a greater degree of generalizability (Hedges & Vevea, 1998).”
- Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “For example, Hinduja and Patchin (2007) included “ignored” and “disrespected” as two items in their measure.”
- The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis (2016, background): “In addition, results may be generalized because the investigated studies are treated as a random subset of a larger study population (Hedges and Vevea 1998).”