Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions

By Michael Doebeli, Ulf Dieckmann. American Naturalist, 2000

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9440500fb52ac18f370c5bd02fdc6641b42e71e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Intraspecific food competition in fishes (2006, background): “High levels of intraspecific competition, for example, are thought to produce an expansion in the niche width of a population as individuals seek to exploit under-utilized resources (Smith and Skulason 1996; Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000) (see Table 5).”
Ecological versus Sexual Selection Models of Sympatric Speciation: A Synthesis (2002, methodology): “This occurred for competitive and various other types of ecological interactions (Doebeli and Dieckmann, 2000).”
Adaptive Speciation: Epilogue (2004, background): “This happens if the phenotypic distance between the two emerging prey species becomes large relative to the width σa of the predation efficiency function (Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000).”
The evolutionary implications of exploitation in mycorrhizas (2004, background): “Doebeli and Dieckmann (2000) developed a model for evolutionary branching for mutualistic and antagonistic symbioses, although they did not explore the issue of relative branching rate differences between mutualistic and antagonistic symbioses.”
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species? (2007, neutral): “…2003; Thomas & al., 2003), as well as assortative mating and disruptive selection (e.g., Udovic, 1980; Turner & Burrows, 1995; Kondrashov & Shpak, 1998; Kondrashov & Kondrashov, 1999; Doebeli & Dieckmann, 2000; Via, 2002; Via & Hawthorne, 2002; Arnegard & Kondrashov, 2004; van Doorn & al., 2004).”
Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation (2003, background): “…can select for pre-mating isolation (e.g. Turner and Burrows, 1995; Higashi et al., 1999) and conditiondependent sexual selection can increase the rate and extent of evolution in ecologically important traits that can lead to post-mating isolation (Kawecki, 1997; Doebeli and Dieckmann, 2000).”
Eco‐evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems (2007, background): “The same ecological model has served as the basis for recent models of sympatric speciation (Dieckmann & Doebeli 1999; Doebeli & Dieckmann 2000 ).”
Female polymorphisms, sexual conflict and limits to speciation processes in animals (2007, positive): “…increasing interest in the early stages of speciation, in particular sympatric speciation and ‘‘evolutionary branching’’ (Dieckmann and Doebeli 1999; Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000) and the recognition that disruptive selection may be more common in nature than was previously thought (Kingsolver et…”
A model for the evolutionary dynamics of cross-feeding polymorphisms in microorganisms (2002, positive): “This has indeed been achieved (Dieckmann and Doebeli 1999; Kisdi and Geritz 1999; Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000), leading to a general theory of adaptive speciation under sympatric conditions, i.e., speciation in the presence of gene flow and in the absence of geographic isolation.”
On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis (2005, methodology): “To summarize, a number of theoretical models suggest that sympatric prey may experience character shifts as readily from interactions with enemies as from interactions with competitors (Holt 1977; Brown and Vincent 1992; Abrams 2000; Doebeli and Dieckmann 2000; Bowers et al. 2003).”
Ecological Opportunity and Adaptive Radiation (2016, background): “As a result, strong selection favors individuals that mate assortatively, leading to increasing reproductive isolation between the subpopulations, which may eventually become different species (Dieckmann & Doebeli 1999, Kondrashov & Kondrashov 1999, Doebeli & Dieckmann 2000).”
Long-term Buildup of Reproductive Isolation Promoted by Disruptive Selection: How Far Does it Go? (2002, background): “This view is based mostly on results from models with asexual reproduction, (Geritz et al., 1998; Geritz et al., 1999; Kisdi, 1999; Doebeli & Dieckmann, 2000 ) but also in the more important case of sexual reproduction and mendelian genetics it is supported by results on secondary evolution of asso”
A beginners guide to adaptive dynamics (2002, background): “– AD as an added feature to a bifurcation diagram [20], – multi-dimensional traits, – when is mutation structure irrelevant for dynamics? [27, 60, 61], – co-evolution [22], – putting genetics underneath [21, 33, 35, 41, 50, 61, 27, 88], – does branching lead to speciation? [21, 33, 41], – bifurcatio”