Long-term Buildup of Reproductive Isolation Promoted by Disruptive Selection: How Far Does it Go?

By C. Matessi, A. Gimelfarb, Sergey Gavrilets. 2002

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f67082952411c37041785e6bba83a6ab530ccdd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Michael Doebeli
2. Regis Ferriere
3. Ulf Dieckmann
4. Diethard Tautz
5. S. M. Vamosi
6. Joel s. Brown
7. Brian J. McGill
8. Franz J. Weissing

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Regis Ferriere
2. Ulf Dieckmann
3. Michael Doebeli
4. Nicolas Champagnat

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Regis Ferriere
2. Michael Doebeli
3. Ulf Dieckmann
4. S. M. Vamosi
5. Brian J. McGill
6. Joel s. Brown
7. Nicolas Champagnat
8. Franz J. Weissing

Citations in the corpus

• Adaptive Speciation: Epilogue (2004, background): “For instance, while Maynard Smith (1966) emphasizes that the “crucial step in sympatric speciation is the establishment of a stable polymorphism”, Felsenstein (1981) contends that progress toward sympatric speciation ought to be measured in terms of the evolution of prezygotic isolation.”
• Adaptive dynamics and evolving biodiversity (2004, background): “However, if the disruptive selection at the branching point is not too weak (Matessi et al. 2001), it selects for increased assortative mating.”