How Derived is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations

By Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon. 2001

1,000 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93faf7734450f1c908096393acbea5fe56ecdb32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS (2005, methodology): “The framework in this form was first crystalised in the work of Oort (1969) and, especially, De Serpa (1971), which serves as a useful point of reference for the discussion.”
Maximum Likelihood and Firth Logistic Regression of the Pedestrian Route Choice (2017, background): “Second, standing for route complexity, the Turns variable was significant, that is, simpler routes were preferred to the shortest route possibly because they are superior in terms of convenience, comfort, and safety (Mokhtarian and Salomon 2001).”
When is Commuting Desirable to the Individual (2004, methodology): “Through factor analysis (see Redmond, 2000 or Mokhtarian et al., 2001 for details of the factor analyses on these as well as the Personality and Lifestyle variables), the statements were distilled into six basic dimensions, of which three were significant in the final models presented here.”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, neutral): “Studies of desire have mainly focused on desired travel amounts (Mokhtarian & Salomon, 2001; Redmond & Mokhtarian, 2001), although some studies analysed the desired use of a certain travel mode (e.g. public transport (Carrus, Passafaro, & Bonnes, 2008; De Vos, Waygood, & Letarte, 2020a)).”
Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs (2013, background): “Fourth, additional complications arise when the sharp demarcation between travel and activity is challenged and travel is regarded as the activity as such, as is the case with recreational walking or cycling or with just driving around (Mokhtarian & Salomon, 2001).”
Travel satisfaction revisited : on the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process (2017, background): “However, there are studies indicating that travel can offer a positive utility in its own right (Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001; Mokhtarian et al., 2015; Ory and Mokhtarian, 2005).”
When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour (2010, background): “Although sometimes people might travel just ‘for fun’ (e.g. Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001; Mokhtarian et al., 2001), people mainly travel in order to access desired activities in other places.”
The Use of Travel Time by Rail Passengers in Great Britain (2007, background): “More recently Mokhtarian and Salomon have identified three means by which positive utility can be derived from travel: “1. the activities conducted at the destination; 2. activities that can be conducted while travelling; 3. the activity of travelling itself” (Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001: 701).”
Telecommunications and Travel: The Case for Complementarity (2002, background): “It appears that individuals are quite adept at adopting “travel-maintaining” strategies that reduce the disutility of travel (Mokhtarian, Raney and Salomon 1997; Salomon and Mokhtarian 1997) – or even at deriving positive utility from the travel itself, as well as from activities that can be conduct”