An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations

By H. Kelley, John G. Holmes, Norbert L. Kerr, Harry T. Reis, C. Rusbult, P. M. Lange. 2003

533 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9363388bb6fe5d9ebe32d6755a2c5b58c3654c46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A healthy dose of trust: The relationship between interpersonal trust and health (2011, background): “The concept of affordance describes what an interpersonal situation activates and “makes possible” for interacting individuals (Kelley et al., 2003).”
Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Systems: Enforcement, Moral Emotions, Dignity, Trust, and Deception (2012, background): “The interdependence space is a 4-D space which maps the location of all interpersonal social situations [31].”
Psychological Foundations of Trust (2007, background): “Two types of situations should give individuals a particularly good opportunity to gauge the level of trust warranted in a partner or relationship: (a) trust situations (Kelley et al., 2003), in which partners can repeatedly make or fail to makeA1/B1 (i.”
Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2011, background): “…of interdependence theory provide a conceptual framework that acknowledges the interdependence between the self and others, as well as a domain of situations in which self-interest and collective interest conflict (Kelley et al., 2003; Kelley & Thibaut, 1978; Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).”
Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering (2011, background): “…to aggression in the media and subsequently be more likely to aggress, so may economists and psychologists choose ‘‘their” worlds in which individualistic versus prosocial orientation is relatively more prevalent – and perhaps more functional (for further discussion, see Kelley et al., 2003).”
Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. (2012, unknown): “This approach shares much with interdependence theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978; Kelley et al., 2003).”
Refining Lewin's formula: A general model for explaining situational influence on individual social behavior (2013, methodology): “These outcomes are negotiated from the proximal environments where the actor is located, using the logic of interdependence theory as conceptualized in the Atlas of Interpersonal Situations (Kelly et al., 2003).”
Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. (2007, background): “My personal opinion is that interdependence theory (Kelley et al. 2003) may offer one such possibility, but my purpose here is not to initiate an opinion poll.”
Are Conservatives Less Likely to be Prosocial than Liberals? From Games to Ideology, Political Preferences and Votingg (2012, background): “…preference and voting can be traced to basic interpersonal differences in prosocial, individualistic and competitive orientations, both in terms of theory and methodology, which are grounded in interdependence and social interaction processes (Kelley et al., 2003; Van Lange & Rusbult, 2011).”
Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. (2007, background): “In the language of interdependence theory (Kelley et al., 2003), their expectancies for interpersonal outcomes during social exchanges, based on their personal experiences (comparison level; CL), are low.”