Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “…(e.g., happiness, insane) to be stored and retrieved as a whole (as opposed to being compositionally derived, for instance by affixation) correlates with the frequency of the complex form (e.g., childish) relative to the frequency of the base form (e.g., child) (Hay, 2001; Blumenthal-Dramé, 2012).”
Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, background): “…ratio for the suffix; cumulative base frequency, the relative frequency of the base, average relative base frequency, and the ratio of word types in which whole word frequency exceeds base frequency and word types in which whole word frequency is lower than base frequency (cf. Hay, 2001).”
A Usage‐Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis (2009, background): “Some of these models (Baayen, 1993; Hay, 2001) propose to consider any accessing event as a combination of the two mechanisms in which one or the other may be prominent.”