Addressing discrepancies between values and behavior:the motivating effect of reasons

By G. Maio, J. Olson, Lindsay Allen, M. Bernard. 2001

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/928f66685ba49956bca20d868b72895d371cd9eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Mark Conner
2. C. Abraham
3. G. Maio
4. Wolfgang Stroebe
5. Bas Verplanken
6. L. Steg
7. P. Sheeran
8. A. S. R. Manstead

In Social Psychology

1. L. Steg
2. G. Maio
3. G. Perlaviciute
4. Wolfgang Stroebe
5. Mark Conner
6. C. Abraham
7. Bas Verplanken
8. P. Sheeran

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Maio
2. L. Steg
3. C. Abraham
4. P. Sheeran
5. Mark Conner
6. G. Perlaviciute
7. I. Ajzen
8. Wolfgang Stroebe

Citations in the corpus

• A Methodology for Assessing Organizational Core Values (2006, unknown): “Such values are difficult to enact in situations that challenge them (Maio and Olson, 1998; Maio et al., 2001).”
• Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy (2007, background): “, helpfulness), they subsequently exhibit much more provalue behavior in such situations (Karremans, 2006; Maio et al., 2001).”
• Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda (2014, background): “Various situational cues could activate values, for example providing reasons for values [116] or value-signalling behaviours of others [117,118].”
• Mental representations of social values (2010, methodology): “The benevolence behavior involved freely volunteering (without obtaining payment or course credit) to help the researcher complete an additional experiment, as in research conducted by Maio et al. (2001).”