Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation

By Baris Yalabik, Richard J. Fairchild. 2011

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9286f719c0c9be79fd3ee8942846ad96a1ba0f51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review (2015, background): “…identify factors affecting environmental orientation adopted by firms such as: financing availability (Johnson & Lybecker, 2012); market demand (Horbach et al., 2012), pressure groups (Yalabik & Fairchild, 2011) or industry characteristics (Peiró-Signes, Segarra-Oña, Miret-Pastor, & Verma, 2011).”
Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective (2017, methodology): “Although this simple form of demand function has the advantages of being analytically more tractable and is widely applied in similar studies (Yalabik and Fairchild 2011; Choudhary et al. 2015, He et al. 2015, Hovelaque and Bironneau 2015; Luo et al. 2016), using deterministic models does not…”
Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review (2014, background): “Similarly, Yalabik and Fairchild (2011) state that green innovation is driven more by competitive market pressure than by the influence of consumers and environmental regulations.”
A Framework of Sustainable Service Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (2017, background): “…influence the serving products greatly, the core enterprises in the service supply chain undertake the main social pressure, including pressure from the government (Dou and Sarkis, 2010 [81]; Kuo et al., 2010 [82]; Muduli et al., 2013 [83]) and from the customers (Yalabik and Fairchild, 2011) [84].”
Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions (2014, background): “Assessing and improving the manufacturer-retailer-interface to eliminate sources of environmentally unsustainable practices, and relating these to consumer utility and reactions from firms is needed (Darlington & Rahimifard, 2007; Yalabik & Fairchild, 2011; Feng, Li, Duan, & Zhang, 2007).”