Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions

By Marcus Brandenburg, Kannan Govindan, Joseph Sarkis, Stefan Seuring. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014

1,150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b91665df73c756913c9b6945ffe42ef87ffa337b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2015, background): “, 2013) or analytical models for green supply chain management (Brandenburg et al., 2014; Govindan et al., 2014).”
Closed-loop supply chains: What reverse logistics factors influence performance? (2016, background): “…of material flows, information and funds, as well as cooperation between firms along the supply chain (SC) that simultaneously consider the three dimensions of sustainable development: environmental, social and economic (Brandenburg et al., 2014; Meixell and Luoma, 2015; Eskandarpour et al., 2015).”
Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective (2017, methodology): “Taking a closer look at group four, the one closest to the objectives of this paper, only four papers identified as their main focus the use of quantitative models in SSC (Brandenburg et al., 2014; Brandenburg & Rebs, 2015; Seuring, 2013; Tang & Zhou, 2012). Tang & Zhou (2012) analyzed 56 papers and”
Supply Chain Management for Improved Energy Efficiency: Review and Opportunities (2017, background): “[38] clustered the literature on sustainable supply chain management according to the approach adopted in the modelling phase with a focus on environmental factors and social aspects of supply chain.”
Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks (2018, background): “For a comprehensive review of the literature in the area of sustainable and green supply chain management, one can refer to Seuring and Müller (2008), Seuring (2013), Brandenburg et al. (2014), Srivastava (2007), and Fahimnia, Sarkis, and Davarzani (2015).”
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation (2016, background): “Examples of work of special relevancy here include Blackhurst and Wu (2009), Brandenburg, Govindan, Sarkis, and Seuring (2014), Heckmann, Comes, and Nickel (2015), Jüttner, Peck, and Christopher (2003), Peck (2006), Tang and Zhou (2012), Zsidisin (2003) and Zsidisin and Ritchie (2010) .”
A Framework of Sustainable Service Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (2017, background): “Brandenburg et al. (2014) [41] summarized the quantitative model of the sustainable development supply chain.”
A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform (2019, neutral): “(2014) Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions [30].”