Adapt or disperse: understanding species persistence in a changing world
By M. Berg, E. Kiers, G. Driessen, Marcel van der Heijden, B. Kooi, F. Kuenen, M. Liefting, H. Verhoef, Jacintha Ellers. 2010
568 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc04c2eb0d8629336c8fce514dd669a4dcaeb0c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Carsten F. Dormann
- C. Rahbek
- Wilfried Thuiller
- M. Baguette
- N. Schtickzelle
- A. Hoffmann
- Alejandro Rozenfeld
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- W. H. van der Putten
- R. Bardgett
- T. Martijn Bezemer
- David A. Wardle
- James D. Bever
- Paul Kardol
- A. Kulmatiski
- Francesco de Bello
In Genetics
- N. Schtickzelle
- M. Baguette
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Francesco de Bello
- C. Rahbek
- David A. Wardle
- C. Sgrò
- Thomas Wardziak
Citations in the corpus
- Diapause research in insects: historical review and recent work perspectives (2019, background): “In particular, thermal optima differ among species within trophic networks (Berg et al., 2010) and phenological responses to climate change vary among taxa (Thackeray et al., 2016).”
- Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2012, background): “For example, it has been well documented that species can change physiologically and morphologically to adapt to their environment (e.g. Davis & Shaw, 2001; Losos & Ricklefs, 2009; Berg et al., 2010; Hofmann & Todgham, 2010; Hill et al., 2011).”
- Plant pathogens, insect pests and weeds in a changing global climate: a review of approaches, challenges, research gaps, key studies and concepts (2012, background): “Theoretical frameworks for climate change research with respect to multi-trophic interactions of insects have been proposed by many authors (e.g. Harrington et al. 2001; Bale et al. 2002; Helmuth 2009; Berg et al. 2010; Gilman et al. 2010; Pelini et al. 2010; Soberon 2010).”
- Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change (2011, methodology): “…as the species contributions to network robustness or the species sensitivity to the loss of links in the network (see for alternative implementations of coexistence networks in biogeography and community ecology: Dos Santos et al. 2008, Blick and Burns 2009, Azaele et al. 2010, Bell et al. 2010).”
- Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions (2018, background): “Additionally, environmental change can modulate biotic interactions via phenological mismatches, such as for plant–pollinator interactions (Berg et al., 2010; Elzinga et al., 2007).”
- Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial‐plant interactions: What lies ahead? (2015, background): “…understanding how soil microbe-microbe and soil microbe-plant interactions respond to climate change is a research priority that will shed light on important ecosystem functions such as soil carbon storage and net primary productivity (Ostle et al. 2009, Berg et al. 2010, Fischer et al. 2014).”
- Thermal plasticity of metabolic rates linked to life‐history traits and foraging behaviour in a parasitic wasp (2011, background): “A pivotal question often addressed is whether the rate and extent of a species’ response to a thermal changing environment enables it to persist in a world changing at a rapid pace (Hance et al. 2007; Berg et al. 2010).”
- Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits (2017, unknown): “For example, traits can help explain the effects of climate change on species distribution and range shift (e.g. Kaustuv, Jablonski & Valentine 2001; Berg et al. 2010; Diamond et al. 2011), environmental gradients and stressors on the distribution of species and community (dis)assembly (e.g. Dias…”
- Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels (2010, background): “Such pleas have been made by several colleagues using a variety of arguments (Davis et al. 1998; Pearson & Dawson 2003; Schmitz et al. 2003; Berg et al. 2010).”
- Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change (2011, background): “Complex interspecific interactions, such as mutualism, competition, predation and parasitism, determine the behavioural response of single species (Berg et al., 2010).”
- Grapevine insect pests and their natural enemies in the age of global warming (2016, background): “In particular, high summer temperatures beyond the species-specific optimal zones and tolerance limits as well as the interaction between mean temperature and temperature variability can negatively affect developmental rates, reproduction or survival of arthropods (Berg et al. 2010; Colinet et al. 2”
- Plant–soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges (2013, background): “munities when species differ in dispersal capacity: plants disperse faster than many soil organisms (Berg et al. 2010).”