Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels

By W. H. van der Putten, Mirka Macel, M. Visser. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010

813 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ff6c513f383c81c76f54aabf671a62bcfda4c7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change (2011, background): “Biotic interactions are increasingly recognized as important components of climate-species relationships (4, 5), but are rarely included in projections of species distributions under future climates, with some notable exceptions (6).”
Outstanding Challenges in the Transferability of Ecological Models. (2018, background): “Species can exhibit immediate responses to one or several components of global change, even though disruptions to networks of biotic interactions can slow down or hasten evolutionary adaptations [96], and population dynamics can lag behind the trend of global change drivers [97].”
Biotic interactions influence the projected distribution of a specialist mammal under climate change (2012, background): “1Centre for Tropical Biodiversity and”
Climate Change Threatens Giant Panda Protection in the 21st Century (2015, background): “…some researchers have suggested that these biotic interactions may be critical to improve the predictive power of SDMs (Miska and Araújo, 2007; Preston et al., 2008; Boulangeat et al., 2012), especially those across trophic levels (Vander Putten et al., 2010; Barbet-Massin and Jiguet, 2011).”
Interactive effects of multiple climate change variables on trophic interactions: a meta-analysis (2014, neutral): “ecosystem services [1-6].”
Effects of climate warming on host–parasitoid interactions (2013, background): “…on host–parasitoid interactions remain little explored and they are noticeably under-represented in literature reviews and meta-analyses on existing biotic responses to climate change (Walther et al ., 2002; Visser & Both, 2005; Parmesan, 2006; Van der Putten et al ., 2010; Bellard et al ., 2012).”
Species distribution modelling of marine benthos: a North Sea case study (2011, background): “However, our understanding of dispersal pathways and species interactions is often limited for marine benthic eco - systems and their inclusion into prognostic SDM approaches remain a challenging but important need (Pearson & Dawson 2003, Elith & Leathwick 2009, Van der Putten et al. 2010).”
Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity (2013, background): “, decadal- to centennial-scale hydrological variability (31)] or nonclimatic factors such as increasing human influence or altered biotic interactions (32, 33) may have played a role.”