Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach

By L. Green, M. Kreuter. 2004

1,589 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92330a67c461658013ad7ebab5317f3d5f260ab7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Susan Michie
2. P. Nilsen
3. C. Abraham
4. M. Eccles
5. D. Fixsen
6. Jeremy M. Grimshaw
7. W. Hardeman
8. C. Greaves

Citations in the corpus

• Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. (2009, background): “These align roughly with the “attributes of innovations and their rate of adoption” extensively documented from decades of research in various applied fields (99) and used to classify and predict the ease or rate of adoption of specific practices recommended in public health (43, 52).”
• Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. (2007, background): “The epidemiology of cervical cancer is fundamental to its prevention (Green and Kreuter, 2004).”
• Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method (2009, background): “Advantages of using explicit rather than implicit theoretical models include providing a consistent and generalisable framework within which to gather evidence; promoting the understanding of causal mechanisms that both enrich theory and facilitate the development of more effective interventions [16”
• The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. (2008, methodology): “Tools to enhance accountability in PR include theory of change models (26), logic models (101), Getting to Outcomes (30), and health program–planning models such as Precede-Proceed (42).”
• Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015, methodology): “d to RE-AIM [124]; PRECEDE-PROCEED [125]; framework by Proctor et al.”
• Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011, background): “Therefore, a planned approach to intervention design is recommended, such as “intervention mapping”,[65] or other systematic intervention development processes[66] which select intervention techniques to address targeted behaviour change processes (and that are tailored for the target population and”
• Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework (2017, methodology): “approaches, such as the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework or the PRECEDE-PROCEED framework [11] can thus be considered evaluation frameworks, whereas the Stetler Model or the Quality Implementation Framework [12] can be classified as process models.”
• Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice (2020, background): “[2], there are a few implementation frameworks that have the expressed purpose of evaluating implementation, including RE-AIM [21], PRECEDE-PROCEED [70], and frameworks by Stetler et al.”
• The Ecological Framework (2019, background): “1 An Ecological Framework An ecological framework recognizes that individual health behaviors are influenced at different levels within a complex environment.(1) This type of framework is commonly used in health program planning, as it illustrates these different levels as embedded health planning s”
• Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework (2019, unknown): “As discussed, EPIS includes levels across the socioecological context [12], touching on factors at the individual, organizational, and systems levels.”