Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex.

By K. Taylor, H. Moss, E. Stamatakis, Lorraine K. Tyler. 2006

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “…form of enhancement in their participants’ behavioral performance or brain activities will be observed (Laurienti et al., 2004; Molholm et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2006; Hein et al., 2007; Yuval-Greenberg and Deouell, 2007; Adam and Noppeney, 2010; Chen and Spence, 2010; Werner and Noppeney,…”
Neural reflections of meaning in gesture, language, and action (2009, background): “2007), pictures of objects and their related sounds (Beauchamp et al. 2004b; Taylor et al. 2006) and pictures of animals and their sounds”
Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect (2008, result): “…not mean, however, that the manipulation of stimulus congruency was ineVective; indeed, other researchers have found eVects of stimulus congruency which did not emerge in the behavioural data (e.g. see Taylor et al. 2006; where the eVects of stimulus congruency emerged in the fMRI data instead).”
Object-Specific Semantic Coding in Human Perirhinal Cortex (2014, background): “…of object features enabling fine-grained distinctions between objects (Buckley et al., 2001; Murray and Richmond, 2001; Bussey and Saksida, 2002; Tyler et al., 2004, 2013; Moss et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 2006, 2009; Barense et al., 2007, 2010, 2012; Mion et al., 2010; Kivisaari et al., 2012).”
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, background): “…1999) and that lesions to these regions temporarily impair performance with learned multisensory associations (e.g Murray and Gaffan, 1994; see also Taylor et al., 2006, 2009), it is far less clear if this is the first locus 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27…”
Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, background): “…AV speech and object stimuli irrespective of sensory ⁄ semantic congruence (Calvert et al., 2000; Beauchamp et al., 2004a,b) but not with respect to semantically congruent vs. incongruent AV object stimuli (although the perirhinal cortex exhibited an enhanced response; Taylor et al., 2006).”
Object Familiarity and Semantic Congruency Modulate Responses in Cortical Audiovisual Integration Areas (2007, background): “Our findings are in line with the results of previous studies that have indicated an important role of pSTS in AV integration (Beauchamp et al., 2004a,b; van Atteveldt et al., 2004, 2007; Taylor et al., 2006).”
The role of auditory cortices in the retrieval of single‐trial auditory–visual object memories (2015, background): “anything, serve as a conduit for integrative processes elsewhere (Taylor et al., 2006; Hocking & Price, 2008).”
Combined diffusion-weighted and functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals a temporal-occipital network involved in auditory-visual object processing (2013, background): “Therefore, its primary role could be multisensory binding of meaningful or communicationrelated (speech) signals (Taylor et al., 2006).”
The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect (2015, background): “An fMRI study of Taylor et al. (2006) for example reports audiovisual semantic congruency effects at the neural level but not at the behavioral level.”
Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. (2006, background): “It has been suggested that the PrC representation extends that supported by more posterior inferotemporal regions by incorporating multi-modal features [27 ,29], abstract conceptual information [27 ,30] and helps to disambiguate stimuli with highly overlapping features [31,32].”