Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance
By Paul Bertelson, Monique Radeau. 1981
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Charles Spence
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Mark T. Wallace
- Jean H. M. Vroomen
- Mirjam Keetels
- Lihan Chen
- Ryan A. Stevenson
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Alternatively, however, one might imagine that such a unity effect was simply a result of response bias induced by the presence of the congruent visual signal instead (see Choe et al., 1975; Bertelson and Radeau, 1981).”
- Rules of intersensory integration in spatial scene analysis and speechreading (2001, result): “However, for distances of 7°, 15° and 25°, there was a small decrease (without elimination) of the ventriloquism effect in one of the experiments of Bertelson and Radeau (1981), but not in the other experiment.”
- Knowledge about a Common Source Can Promote Visual — Haptic Integration (2007, background): “…similarity between the bimodal sensory input, such as the degree of temporal synchrony (eg Choe et al 1975; Jack and Thurlow 1973; Klemm 1909; Radeau and Bertelson 1977, 1987; Thomas 1941) or the amount of spatial separation (eg Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Choe et al 1975; Thurlow and Jack 1973).”
- Attention to sound improves auditory reliability in audio-tactile spatial optimal integration (2015, result): “Our results are in line with several studies showing that attention to a sensory modality might affect perceptual estimates in multisensory tasks (Bertelson and Radeau, 1981; Warren et al., 1981; Alsius et al., 2005). For example Oruc et al. (2008) demonstrated that in crossmodal dynamic ventriloqui”
- Infants' perception of the audible, visible, and bimodal attributes of multimodal syllables. (2000, background): “In this case, when subjects are presented with a lateralized sound and a concurrent but spatially disparate visual stimulus, they report hearing the sound as emanating from a location closer to the visual stimulus ( Bertelson & Radeau, 1976, 1981; Jack & Thurlow, 1973).”
- Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. (2008, unknown): “In favor of the idea that attention can affect multisensory integration, it was found that observers report different percepts when asked to respond to one sensory modality versus another sensory modality (e.g., Bertelson & Radeau, 1981; Massaro, 1998; Warren, Welch, & McCarthy, 1981).”
- Cortical Hierarchies Perform Bayesian Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception (2015, background): “For small spatial disparities, audiovisual spatial signals are integrated weighted by their relative sensory reliabilities leading to strong crossmodal spatial biases [3]; for large spatial disparities, these crossmodal biases are greatly attenuated [11,12], because the final spatial estimate relies”
- Effects of separating auditory and visual sources on audiovisual integration of speech (1997, background): “…nonspeech events seems to be integrated based on similar rules proposed by Gestalt psychologists for visual grouping; namely common fate and proximity (e.g., Bermant & Welch, 1976; Bertelson, 1993; Bertelson & Radeau, 1981; Jack & Thurlow, 1973; Radeau & Bertelson, 1977,1978; Welch & Warren, 1980).”
- Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “Spatial ventriloquist effect Sound localization/ fusion Whether bias occurred only with fusion Vision attracts auditory location without fusion Bertelson and Radeau (1981) Speech identification / sound localization Role of "unity assumption" Ventriloquism unaffected by face orientation Bertelson et…”
- Sound induces perceptual reorganization of an ambiguous motion display in human infants (2003, background): “The ventriloquism effect (Bertelson & Radeau, 1981) shows how the localization of a sound source can be changed by a spatially discordant visual stimulus.”
- Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources? (2001, background): “Lo- calization is usually shifted in the direction of the light, despite instructions to focus only on the target sound (e.g., Bertelson & Radeau, 1981).”
- Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration (2007, background): “Although there is substantial evidence that attention can modulate the processing of information within individual sensory systems, limited data exist on how attention may impact the integration of information across sensory systems (Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Bertelson et al. 2000; Vroomen et al. 2”
- A Neural Network Model of Ventriloquism Effect and Aftereffect (2012, unknown): “Values predicted by the model are within the range of behavioral data [2,6,8], as shown in Fig.”