A Methodology to Evaluate the Competitiveness of Electric Delivery Trucks
By Brian Davis, Miguel Andres Figliozzi. 2013
260 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90fa42d0e8cdc85fca477dd034f486693c2ccfaf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Michael Schneider
- Dominik Goeke
- David Aplyn
- Xiaopeng Shaw Li
- Sina Ansari
- Oscar Patrick René van Vliet
- Karen R. Smilowitz
- Mehmet Basdere
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Michael Schneider
- David Aplyn
- Oscar Patrick René van Vliet
- Heikki Liimatainen
- Dominik Goeke
- Andreas Stenger
Citations in the corpus
- Routing a mixed fleet of electric and conventional vehicles (2015, methodology): “Davis and Figliozzi (2013) show that ECVs are competitive in comparison to ICCVs for certain application scenarios with large route distances and low vehicle speeds.”
- Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016 (2017, methodology): “Du et al. (1999) also provide a general discussion on Central Voronoi Tessellations (CVT).”
- The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity-level analysis (2019, methodology): “Davis & Figliozzi [22] developed a methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric trucks and Feng & Figliozzi [23] showed that electric trucks are economically competitive in high utilization scenarios.”
- The Electric Vehicle-Routing Problem with Time Windows and Recharging Stations (2014, methodology): “ECVs are among the cleanest means of transport because they can be powered by sustainable and renewable energy sources (Dekker, Bloemhof, and Mallidis 2012; Davis and Figliozzi 2013), they have no local GHG emissions, and they produce only minimal noise.”