Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies (2009, methodology): “By way of illustration, O’Cathain et al. (2007) reviewed mixed methods studies in the field of health services research in England.”
An Examination of Research Methods in Mathematics Education (1995-2005) (2009, background): “We would argue that it behooves mathematics educators and others who use mixed methods in their research to clearly describe and justify their particular choices of methods within the context of their purposes and perspectives (c.f. O’Cathain et al., 2007).”
The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research (2011, methodology): “Mixing refers to how the quantitative data and results are related to the qualitative data and results, and it aims to produce understandings that go beyond simply what is learned from the separate components of the study (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007; O’Cathain et al., 2007).”
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies (2010, background): “Recent empirical studies of mixed methods research in health show, however, a lack of integration between components,”
Mixed Methods Approaches in Family Science Research (2008, background): “Mixed methods scholars have noted that many mixed methods studies do not sufficiently integrate (or mix) their quantitative and qualitative methods (Greene et al., 1989; O’Cathain et al., 2007).”