Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice

By Margot Pearson *, C. Kayrooz. 2004

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9084b8b6aba77bb136e6f15d732c40aaf406c4bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Halse
2. J. Malfroy
3. Antònia Darder
4. Jesús Aguiló Salinas
5. A. Pérez
6. M. L. Orellana

In General Health Professions

1. C. Halse
2. J. Malfroy
3. Antònia Darder
4. Jesús Aguiló Salinas
5. A. Pérez
6. M. L. Orellana

Citations in the corpus

• Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work (2010, background): “Vilkinas 2007 ), or frameworks based on conceptions of research (Lee 2008 ) or developed for the purpose of reflective practice (Pearson and Kayrooz 2004 ).”
• Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors (2016, background): “Pearson and Kayrooz (2004) categorized the tasks and responsibilities of supervision into four groups: those related to the progress of the candidate, mentoring (personal and professional support, including the connection of the student with research networks, both academic and professional),…”