Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa

By L. Ries, D. Debinski. 2001

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/904533157d601a97bf2173e376e926f6ee20b739

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants (2013, background): “As a result, both pollinator community responses and foraging behavior may differ between the two contexts leading to differential effects of habitat loss on pollination (Cane et al., 2006; Krewenka et al., 2011; Ries and Debinski, 2001; Slagle and Hendrix, 2009).”
Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius (2004, background): “Similarly, Ries and Debinski (2001) found that the prairie habitat specialist, Speyeria idalia, responded strongly to edges, turning to avoid crossing them and returning to the plot if they had crossed an edge.”
Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? (2005, background): “Most behavioural research has focused on dispersal propensity (e.g. habitat boundary crossing – Morales, 2002; Bayne & Hobson, 2001; Ries & Debinski, 2001; Schultz & Crone, 2001; Bakker & Van Vuren, 2004; Lin & Batzli, 2004b), but less is known about the importance of behavioural variation in the…”
Functional conservation units for the endangered Alcon Blue butterfly Maculinea alcon in Belgium (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) (2004, background): “Behavioural responses can have important implications for the optimal design of habitat edges, stepping stones or corridors (Schultz, 1998; Haddad, 1999; Ricketts, 2001; Ries and Debinski, 2001; Schultz and Crone, 2001).”
Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) (2003, background): “…birds: e.g. Cassady St. Clair et al. 1998; Brooker et al. 1999; amphibians: Vos et al. submitted; carabids: e.g. Vermeulen 1995; Tischendorf et al. 1998; butterflies: e.g. Haddad 1999; Conradt et al. 2000; Conradt et al. 2001; Dover and Fry 2001; Ricketts 2001; Ries and Debinski 2001; Roland at al.”
A Classification of Ecological Boundaries (2003, background): “In many cases, boundaries are reflective: Organisms or materials that approach the boundary are returned to the patch from which they originated (highly reflective boundaries are sometimes called hard boundaries; Lidicker 1999, Ries and Debinski 2001).”
Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape (2005, background): “However, the behavioral rules animals use to make such multiple movements should be well characterized by simulations of single moves between patches (Ries and Debinski 2001, Conradt et al. 2003).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “However, migration decisions may depend on other factors than density: whether the butterfly is a generalist or a specialist (Ries and Debinski 2001), whether it is male or female (Petit et al. 2001), the degree of disturbance (Binzenhöfer and Settele 2000; Nowicki et al. 2007) and the temporal…”
Movements of cactus bugs: Patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability (2004, background): “We did not investigate potential boundary effects between patches of suitable habitat and the matrix, however, which could have influenced patch emigration probabilities Kuussaari et al. 1996; Haddad 1999; Ries and Debinski 2001 and net displacement rates.”
Interpatch movement and edge effects: the role of behavioral responses to the landscape matrix (2006, unknown): “Our understanding of these mechanisms should benefit from detailed study of individual movement behavior near patch-matrix edges (Ries and Debinski 2001, Schultz and Crone 2001, Schtickzelle and Baguette 2003).”
Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes (2003, background): “As an example, Ries and Debinski [12] tracked the behaviour of two butterfly species at four edge types (ranging from low to high contrast) to determine the extent to which habitat boundaries act as a barrier to emigration.”
Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes (2007, unknown): “…into the cover type on the other side of the boundary (e.g. Kuussaari, Nieminen & Hanski 1996; Jonsen & Taylor 2000; Conradt, Roper & Thomas 2001; Ries & Debinski 2001; Collinge & Palmer 2002; Norberg, Enfjall & Leimar 2002; Schtickzelle & Baguette 2003; Davis & Stamps 2004; Hein, Poethke &…”
Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? (2007, background): “At least some butterfly species tend to avoid crossing boundaries between two open habitats, such as the ones between grasslands and arable fields (Ries and Debinski 2001; Schultz and Crone 2001; Schtickzelle and Baguette 2003).”
Predicting monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) movement and egg-laying with a spatially-explicit agent-based model: The role of monarch perceptual range and spatial memory (2018, background): “…milkweed density are nearly exclusively chosen by the monarch agents (simulations not shown), which is not consistent with field observations that indicate the monarch is a vagile species (Zalucki and Kitching, 1982b; Zalucki and Suzuki, 1987; Ries and Debinski, 2001; Zalucki and Lammers, 2010).”