Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Soil Change: Why Soil Science Must Embrace an Ecosystems Approach

By D. A. Robinson, N. Hockley, E. Dominati, Inmaculada Lebron, K. Scow, Brian Reynolds, Bridget Emmett, Aidan Keith, L. W. Jonge, P. Schjønning and 3 more. 2012

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5432649e3aff970fe155a0089257c6b33235ed5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. I. Truckle
2. Anil Graves
3. Timothy S. Farewell
4. Joe Morris
5. L. Deeks
6. M. Kibblewhite
7. R. Rickson
8. J. Harris

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Michel Duru
2. Olivier Thérond
3. M. Moraine
4. J. Harris

Citations in the corpus

• The total costs of soil degradation in England and Wales (2015, background): “This understanding is also needed to inform ‘safe’or ‘target’ indicator levels beyondwhichecosystems servicesmight beundesirably or irreversibly compromised (Robinson et al., 2012).”
• Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review (2016, background): “Developing ecosystem services through agriculture involves working across organization levels on the causal chain: management practices-property (state)-process (intensity)-service (level) (Carpenter et al. 2011; Robinson et al. 2012).”