Reconciliation after Genocide, Mass Killing, or Intractable Conflict: Understanding the Roots of Violence, Psychological Recovery, and Steps toward a General Theory

By E. Staub. 2006

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9016fe63a04a9db64504594c91caa390105e7862

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Silencing the Past (2010, background): “Second, there is some agreement that perpetrators and their group will find it hard to heal the wounds created by their actions as long as they choose to deny or justify their behavior (Ignatieff, 1994; Staub, 2006; Tutu, 1999).”
Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model (2015, background): “One was to define reconciliation very broadly, for example, as “a changed psychological orientation toward the other” (Staub, 2006, p. 868) or “a change of motivations, goals, beliefs, attitudes and emotions” (Bar-Tal, 2009, p. 365).”
Forgive and Forget? Antecedents and Consequences of Intergroup Forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2008, background): “Such a process of engaging with past political violence may ultimately lead to development of more positive intergroup relations and facilitate the healing of political society (Lederach, 1997; Staub, 2006).”
Toward a theory of transformative entrepreneuring: Poverty reduction and conflict resolution in Rwanda's entrepreneurial coffee sector (2013, background): “Poverty and inequality are two causal factors in the initiation and prolongation of conflict as people go to war over scarce resources or try to change socio-economic inequalities through violence (Collier, 2007; Staub, 2006).”
Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda (2013, background): “Acknowledging that both parties have suffered increases the prospects of developing a shared memory of the conflict (Staub, 2006).”
National Narrative and Social Psychological Influences in Turks’ Denial of the Mass Killings of Armenians as Genocide (2013, neutral): “Acknowledgment of responsibility and reparative actions by perpetrator groups are essential elements of reconciliation in the aftermath of mass violence (Staub, 2006, 2013; Vollhardt, 2013).”
Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs (2014, background): “Alternatively, we should think aboutmoremultidimensional and systemic interventions including, for example, new legislation, peace education within society, and reducing intergroup threat by promoting reconciliation between conflict parties (Bar-Tal & Rosen, 2009; Staub, 2006).”