Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions (2017, background): “In intergroup interactions, members of majority groups seek to be liked and affirmed as moral by members of the minority group, whereas minority-group members are motivated to satisfy needs for respect and empowerment (Bergsieker, Shelton, & Richeson, 2010; Nadler & Shnabel, 2015).”
Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations (2017, background): “…by intergroup beliefs and wider explanatory ideologies on the specific emotions elicited, such as guilt or shame, and on what groups do as a consequence, such as make apologies or pursue reconciliation (e.g., Doosje, Branscombe, Spears, & Manstead, 2006; Iyer & Leach, 2008; Nadler & Shnabel, 2015).”
The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood (2017, background): “The basic premise of the Needs-based Model for Reconciliation (Nadler & Shnabel, 2008, for a review see Nadler & Shnabel, 2015) is that individuals and groups assess themselves and each other along two distinct identity dimensions, namely: the agency dimension subsuming traits such as influence and…”