Modeling complexes of modeled proteins

By Ivan V. Anishchenko, Petras J. Kundrotas, Ilya A. Vakser. 2017

27 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. Petras J. Kundrotas
2. Ilya A. Vakser
3. Andriy Kryshtafovych
4. Taras Dauzhenka
5. Ivan V. Anishchenko
6. Ezgi Karaca
7. Burcu Ozden
8. Michael J.E. Sternberg

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment of the CASP14 Assembly Predictions (2021, methodology): “Strikingly, their best H1065 model emanated from using the CASP server models as an input to TMdock, 49,50 (Elofsson Group, personal communication).”
• Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model. (2018, background): “In addition, a simple resi-due-residue contact potential by Miyazawa and Jernigan MJ3h (80) was also tested because of its best performance in scoring of protein docking decoys (81,82).”
• Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins (2020, methodology): “However, for quantitative comparison with the earlier work, 33 we also used results of the “diagonal” docking (see Methods), where protein models have the same rank (Fig.”