Transgression Severity and Forgiveness: Different Moderators for Objective and Subjective Severity
By F. Fincham, Hope Jackson, S. Beach. 2005
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f3ef0a8fc03ae2311e0c9c00e4f004c5350d1cc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- S. Beach
- F. Fincham
- Judith A. Hall
- Ryan Fehr
- Michele J. Gelfand
- M. Nag
- Everett L. Worthington Jr.
- M. McCullough
In Social Psychology
- S. Beach
- F. Fincham
- Ryan Fehr
- Judith A. Hall
- Michele J. Gelfand
- M. Nag
- Everett L. Worthington Jr.
- M. McCullough
Citations in the corpus
- Forgiveness in Marriage: Current Status and Future Directions (2006, background): “This is one reason why Gandhi (2000) stated that ‘‘the weak can never forgive.”
- Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships? (2007, methodology): “Following a common practice in prior research we used an offence specific assessment of forgiveness (Fincham et al., 2005; Karremans et al., 2003; McCullough, Worthington, & Rachal, 1997).”
- The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. (2010, background): “Apologies may mitigate victims’ negative perceptions of their offenders (Fehr & Gelfand, in press), as should victims’ understanding of their offenders’ perspectives (Exline, Baumeister, Zell, Kraft, & Witvliet, 2008) and perceptions of the severity of harm incurred (Fincham et al., 2005).”