Emotions, Attributions, and Policy Endorsement in Response to the September 11th Terrorist Attacks

By Melody Sadler, M. Lineberger, Joshua Correll, Bernadette Park. 2005

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f33f48035de658e0c36e083edfab2bf75ffd00b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. Christopher W Bauman
3. Thomas F. Denson
4. Brian Lickel
5. Martijn van Zomeren

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. Christopher W Bauman
3. M. Spanovic
4. Thomas F. Denson
5. Brian Lickel
6. N. Petrović
7. Eran Halperin
8. Martijn van Zomeren

Citations in the corpus

• Confrontational and Preventative Policy Responses to Terrorism: Anger Wants a Fight and Fear Wants "Them" to Go Away (2006, background): “…Bodenhausen, Sheppard, & Kramer, 1994; DeSteno, Petty, Wegener, & Rucker, 2000; Keltner, Ellsworth, & Edwards, 1993; Lerner & Keltner, 2000; Lerner et al., 2003), including policy preferences following the 9/11 terrorist attacks (e.g., Lerner et al., 2003; Sadler et al., 2005; Skitka et al., 2004).”
• Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: Evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska (2010, background): “For example, although research (e.g., Cheung-Blunden & Blunden, 2008; Sadler et al., 2005; Skitka et al., 2006) indicates that anger was a strong predictor for overseas military action after 9/11 (first in Afghanistan and then Iraq), the political arguments about why military action were needed…”