Ten Years of Psychological Research on Men and Masculinity in the United States: Dominant Methodological Trends

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring Gender: Options and Issues (2010, background): “Yanico (1985) reported strong correlations for 77 women’s F and M scores across a 3-year span (rs ≥ 0.”
Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. (2013, background): “Whorley and Addis (2006), for instance, noted in their review of methodological trends in research on the psychology of men that very few studies have included a manipulation of any independent variable.”
Is “masculinity” a problem?: Framing the effects of gendered social learning in men. (2010, background): “In the most recent review Whorley and Addis (2006) quantitatively assessed methodological trends in research on the psychology of men and described several characteristics of existing studies.”
The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, unknown): “One topic that has until recently only been partially addressed is how masculinity ideology operates in both women and men (Whorley & Addis, 2006).”