Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others

By Kerry L. Marsh, Michael J. Richardson, R. Baron, Richard C. Schmidt. 2006

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef665db24e17c1ea6d4d0c5e7f1163d2f92e57a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. (2007, background): “Such mimicry-based approaches to interpersonal coordination, however, have not systematically examined the relationship between the stability of interpersonal coordination and the social psychological aspects of interpersonal interaction (Marsh et al., 2006; Richardson et al., 2005; Sebanz, Bekkerin”
Synchrony and destructive obedience (2012, background): “Following on work by Marsh, Richardson, Baron, and Schmidt ( 2006 ), it also tests the hypothesis that in-phase coordination (ie, synchrony) generates greater connection/attraction than does anti-phase coordination.”
The Affordances for Social Psychology of the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing (2007, background): “…in work on distributed and situated cognition (Clancey, 1997; Greeno, 1998), in research drawing on dynamic systems approaches (Fogel et al., 2006; Marsh et al., 2006; Richardson, Marsh, & Schmidt, 2005), and in neuroscience explorations of expressive movements (Atkinson, Dittrich, Gemmell, &…”
The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency vs. Joint-Agency (2012, background): “Interestingly, in a series of experiments, Richardson and colleagues (Isenhower et al., 2005; Marsh et al., 2006; Richardson et al., 2007a) have shown that when acting together, people also take into account the motor affordances of their coactors.”
Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation (2013, background): “For example, becoming entrained can introduce synergy that could potentially reduce mutual metabolic costs of interacting (Marsh et al., 2006).”
Language Use, Coordination, and the Emergence of Cooperative Action (2008, background): “[ 42 ]). In addition, people frequently engage in “joint actions” [13] in which, sometimes, affordances are only afforded because people are able to coordinate their behaviors.”
Team Coordination in Basketball: Description of the Cognitive Connections Among Teammates (2010, background): “Several researchers have suggested that communication and coordination between individuals in a collective emerge from the mutuality of their interactions (eg, Marsh, Richardson, Baron, & Schmidt, 2006 ; Maturana & Varela, 1987 ; Saavedra et al, 1993 ; Salembier & Zouinar, 2000 ).”
Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. (2009, background): “When two people come together with a common goal the action capabilities of the dyad in many cases will exceed (or at least differ from) the action capabilities of either individual (Marsh et al., 2006).”