Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination.

By Michael J. Richardson, Kerry L. Marsh, R. Isenhower, Justin Goodman, Richard C. Schmidt. Human Movement Science, 2007

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43acb7d919d2276a9198559d3367126cadbcf168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

How does it feel to act together? (2014, background): “First, the mechanisms of action specification and control involved in joint action are typically more complex than those present in individual actions, since it is crucial for joint action that people coordinate their plans and actions.”
Measuring the Dynamics of Interactional Synchrony (2012, neutral): “…were attracted to the equilibrium points of a weakly coupled oscillator system and, consequently, that a dynamical synchronization process of coupled oscillators is constraining the coordination of rhythmic movements of the two participants (Richardson et al. 2005, 2007; Schmidt and O’Brien 1997).”
Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology (2009, background): “We can make specific predictions about the conditions under which certain kinds of phenomena will occur, and make novel predictions about what will constrain and compel others to cooperate in joint action tasks (e.g., Richardson et al., 2007; Schmidt & Richardson, 2008).”
The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. (2013, background): “…(Richardson & Dale 2005), clapping (Neda et al. 2000), pendulum swinging (Richardson et al. 2005, Schmidt & O’Brien 1997), rocking chair movement (Richardson et al. 2007), waving (Lakens 2010), finger tapping (Oullier et al. 2008), music making (e.g., piano playing; Keller et al. 2007), and…”
Interpersonal Synchrony: A Survey of Evaluation Methods across Disciplines (2012, background): “cross-spectral coherence [80], [107], [77] or power spectrum”
The interactive brain hypothesis (2012, background): “Particularly relevant are studies of dynamical patterns in interpersonal coordination (Richardson et al., 2007; Marsh et al., 2009; Shockley et al., 2009; Riley et al., 2011), joint action (Sebanz et al.”
Synchronization in a goal-directed task: Human movement coordination with each other and robotic partners (2011, background): “In the study of Richardson et al. [4] people were instructed to start moving at different times and it was found that during a non-goal directed task like rocking in chairs people nevertheless mainly exhibit in-phase relation independent from the temporal difference with which they started moving.”
Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach (2012, background): “Richardson et al. (2007) have demonstrated that during interaction, there is a tight coupling of visual attention.”