Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization

By I. Kaul. 2003

711 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef1c752152364957b3191c9284474d85cadfb9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World (2015, positive): “However, the authors’ focus is not broad enough to encompass the dominant role of business organizations in co-creating global governance and providing global public goods (Kaul et al. 2003; Scherer and Palazzo 2011) or the many emerging governance arrangements that integrate governments, businesses”
Sustainable development goals and inclusive development (2016, background): “A relational approach ﬁrst requires a rethinking of how merit and public goods are managed (Kaul et al. 2003) and whether the privatization and securitization of these by state entities compromises human security or not.”
Higher education: a public good or a commodity for trade? (2008, background): “See also several papers in Kaul et al. (1999) and Kaul et al. (2003).”
The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem☆ (2012, background): “For health, the WHO was established; for proliferation the IAEA was put in place; and IOM takes care of migration (see, for instance, cases discussed in (Kaul et al., 2003; Held and Mcgrew, 2002).”
Global Public Goods (2016, background): “Source: This box draws on Kaul et al. (2003)”
Food as Commons or Commodity? Exploring the Links between Normative Valuations and Agency in Food Transition (2017, background): “We subscribe the consideration of any given good as private or public is a result of “deliberate policy choices” made by society [74] according to what is perceived as a public need, rather than containing certain inherent characteristics of non-excludability and non-rivalry [222].”