Narrative inquiry in psychology: exploring the tensions within

By Brett W. Smith, A. Sparkes. 2006

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In recent years, qualitative researchers in psychology have become increasingly interested in narrative inquiry. With a view to stimulating dialogue, in this article, we seek to make better sense of this field by exploring a range of theoretical tensions and differences embedded within it. Organized around three overall themes, eight contrasting perspectives are presented for discussion. Theme one, termed ‘narrative and the self’, is comprised of tensions surrounding: the relation between narrative and self; the unity of self; and the coherence of self. Theme two, ‘ontology or nature of narrative’, covers: (neo)realism/relativism; interiority or externality; and constructionism. The final theme, labelled ‘approaches to narrative research’, consists of tensions entailing: the whats and/or the hows, and an analysis of narrative and storytelling. We close by suggesting that each contrasting perspective is worthy of consideration in its own right and that co-existence is possible despite some differences.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e834524f62672774a1439ab32184fe9eec85eda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Peter Mcilveen
  2. Brett W. Smith
  3. K. Douglas
  4. D. Carless
  5. A. Sparkes
  6. I. Taylor
  7. Nikos Ntoumanis

In Language and Linguistics

  1. Peter Mcilveen
  2. Brett W. Smith
  3. K. Douglas
  4. D. Carless
  5. A. Sparkes
  6. Yuko Goto Butler
  7. R. Ellis
  8. Ofra Inbar-Lourie

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Brett W. Smith
  2. K. Douglas
  3. D. Carless
  4. Peter Mcilveen
  5. A. Sparkes
  6. I. Taylor
  7. Nikos Ntoumanis
  8. Kerry R. McGannon

Citations in the corpus