Punctuations and agendas: A new look at local government budget expenditures

By Meagan M. Jordan. 2003

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e1a9b074dd390f0f55b2c1bde8efbfcfd12d48a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Stuart Soroka
2. Bryan D. Jones
3. P. John
4. C. Green‐Pedersen
5. M. Foucault
6. Christopher Wlezien
7. Frank R. Baumgartner
8. P. Mortensen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Mortensen
2. P. John
3. Stuart Soroka
4. Bryan D. Jones
5. C. Green‐Pedersen
6. M. Foucault
7. Christopher Wlezien
8. Frank R. Baumgartner

In Public Administration

1. C. Green‐Pedersen
2. P. John
3. Frank R. Baumgartner
4. Bryan D. Jones
5. P. Mortensen
6. Christian Breunig
7. Frédéric Varone
8. S. Meijerink

Citations in the corpus

• A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis (2009, background): “…peaks and extended tails, and clearly not Gaussian (Baumgartner, Foucault, and François 2006; Breunig 2006; Breunig and Koski 2006; John and Margetts 2003; Jones and Baumgartner 2005a; Jordan 2003; Mortensen 2005; Robinson 2004; Soroka, Wlezien, and McLean 2006; True, Jones, and Baumgartner 2007).”
• A Model of Choice for Public Policy (2004, background): “…of budget changes for the U.S. national government is not unique; other studies have found similar distributions in U.S. municipalities (Jordan 2003), British and German national budgets (Breunig 2003; John and Margetts 2003), Danish local budgets (Mortensen 2003), and Texas school…”