Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation
By Scott A. Shane. 2004
1,364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e141d6016d5f7d828e17f4ed7608116d075d427
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike Wright
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Silvio Vismara
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Einar Rasmussen
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Johan Wiklund
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Mike Wright
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Johan Wiklund
- David B. Audretsch
- Dean A. Shepherd
Citations in the corpus
- Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, background): “As Etzkowitz (2002), Rothaermel et al. (2007), and Shane (2004) have shown, university-industry relationships and academic entrepreneurship is a burgeoning field of research, though there has been less research on alternative models for organizing the commercialization of university inventions.”
- Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates' career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? (2020, background): “…Lehmann 2005; Clark 1998; Di Gregorio and Shane 2003; Guerrero and Urbano 2012; Guerrero et al., 2015; Guerrero and Urbano, 2019; O’Shea et al. 2008; Shane 2004; Wright et al. 2007) to identify entrepreneurial universities consider: the promotion of an entrepreneurial culture across the university…”
- Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities (2006, background): “…research as well as a tangible implementation of the entrepreneurial vision of university research (Fontes, 2003; Clarysse and Moray, 2004; Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000; Jones-Evans and Magnus, 1998; Roberts, 1991; Carayannis et al., 1998; Smilor et al., 1990; Shane, 2004; O’Shea et al., 2005).”
- Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities (2016, background): “…tends to focus on commercialisation of university research via patenting, licensing and spin-outs, and the related institutional instruments such as technology transfer offices, incubators and science parks (Rothaermel et al. 2007; Shane 2004; Guerrero and Urbano 2014; Markman et al. 2005).”
- A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, background): “In the past, several authors have conjectured that universities as stakeholders can be one of the most influential factors in encouraging new entrepreneurs (Bacq & Alt, 2018; Debackere & Veugelers, 2005; Di Gregorio & Shane, 2003; Dyer, 2017; Henderson & Robertson, 1999; Peterman & Kennedy, 2003; Ro”
- Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth (2009, background): “Fostering spin-off firms, within the aim of commercialization of university research, is today at the core of many national and local economic policies, including Europe, North America and increasingly Asia (Kroll and Liefner 2008; Rasmussen 2008; Shane 2004).”
- The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations on Academics’ Entrepreneurial Intention (2016, background): “In our empirical application, we follow Hottenrott et al., (2012) and we specify our regressions to test for complementarities as: Z = {{00} , {01} , {10} , {11}} and the Y function is supermodular in the motivation couples, that is, The set of the four states of the world in each specifications (6)”
- The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2017, background): “Academic entrepreneurs can take these opportunities to market, or they can spill over into existing startups (Shane, 2004; Krichhoff et al., 2007).”
- Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs (2009, background): “For example, governments promote the formation of technology transfer agencies which assist the transfer of technology (Henderson, Jaffe, & Trajtenberg, 1998), and they have launched programs that provide incentives for universities to support patenting activities (Shane, 2004b).”
- University Innovation and the Professor's Privilege (2016, neutral): “Studies have since examined the potential effects of Bayh-Dole on patent rates (e.g., Mowery et al. 2001), patent quality (e.g., Henderson et al. 1998), and entrepreneurship (e.g.,Shane 2004) among other issues.”
- Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment (2014, background): “Empirical findings on university spin-offs are primarily based upon US and English universities (see Hsu et al., 2007; Shane, 2004; O’Shea et al., 2005; Lawton-Smith et al., 2005; Markman et al., 2004), although growing academic interest in the mechanisms of such spin-offs can now be observed in…”
- Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies (2006, background): “First, national governments have an impact on spin-off activity in various ways (see Shane, 2004).”