Biphasic Dose Response in Low Level Light Therapy

By Ying-ying Huang, Aaron C.-H. Chen, James Carroll, Michael R Hamblin. Dose-Response, 2009

1,089 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The use of low levels of visible or near infrared light for reducing pain, inflammation and edema, promoting healing of wounds, deeper tissues and nerves, and preventing cell death and tissue damage has been known for over forty years since the invention of lasers. Despite many reports of positive findings from experiments conducted in vitro, in animal models and in randomized controlled clinical trials, LLLT remains controversial in mainstream medicine. The biochemical mechanisms underlying the positive effects are incompletely understood, and the complexity of rationally choosing amongst a large number of illumination parameters such as wavelength, fluence, power density, pulse structure and treatment timing has led to the publication of a number of negative studies as well as many positive ones. A biphasic dose response has been frequently observed where low levels of light have a much better effect on stimulating and repairing tissues than higher levels of light. The so-called Arndt-Schulz curve is frequently used to describe this biphasic dose response. This review will cover the molecular and cellular mechanisms in LLLT, and describe some of our recent results in vitro and in vivo that provide scientific explanations for this biphasic dose response.

Subfields: Insect Science, Pharmacology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8de8066640b849e67b892689d540311635f8c17a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

  1. Michael R Hamblin

In Pharmacology

  1. Michael R Hamblin

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Michael R Hamblin

Citations in the corpus