Conceptual and taxonomic issues.

By W. J. Livesley. 2001

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8dc168272ea2f58bdff39354dd98f669b919529f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Narcissism at the crossroads: phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. (2008, background): “Livesley (2001) noted that many of the DSM personality disorder diagnoses demonstrate limited internal consistency and high diagnostic overlap.”
Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. (2008, background): “It has been argued that these types of models address many of the problems associated with the current DSM conceptualization of PDs (e.g., comorbidity, limited coverage, and the use of a categorical distinction; see Livesley, 2001).”
Different Provocations Trigger Aggression in Narcissists and Psychopaths (2010, background): “Narcissism and psychopathy may be more difficult to disentangle at the level of clinical disorders (Livesley, 2001).”
Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. (2005, result): “…MPQ scale for aggression), consistent with the considerable amount of research indicating a continuum between normal and abnormal personality functioning (Cloninger, 2000; Livesley, 2001; Reynolds & Clark, 2001; Saulsman & Page, 2004; Trull & Durrett, in press; Tyrer, 2001; Widiger & Costa, 2002).”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, methodology): “The theoretical and clinical origins of these diagnoses are diverse, but none would trace its history or origin to personality trait research (Livesley, 2001; Millon et al., 1996).”