Equivalence and bias : A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures

By F. Vijver, K. Leung. 2010

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8dba257700f8d43c6c26d21d59f55a3a8f4cf62c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jia He
2. Lukas Blinka
3. Veronika Kalmus
4. Kjartan Ólafsson
5. Diana Boer

In Social Psychology

1. Jia He
2. Lukas Blinka
3. Veronika Kalmus
4. Kjartan Ólafsson
5. Diana Boer
6. Katja Hanke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jia He
2. Lukas Blinka
3. Veronika Kalmus
4. Kjartan Ólafsson
5. Katja Hanke

Citations in the corpus

• Does It Matter What Mama Says: Evaluating the Role of Parental Mediation in European Adolescents’ Excessive Internet Use (2015, methodology): “To minimise biases and maximise equivalence (van de Vijver and Leung, 2011), several a priori procedures were used (G€orzig, 2012).”
• Psychological capital: internal and external validity of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) on a South African sample (2013, unknown): “From a psychometric point of view, such a study will assist in establishing equivalence and eliminating bias in order to assist practitioners to maximise the validity of inferences that are drawn from PsyCap test scores (Van de Vijver & Leung, 2011).”
• On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests (2018, background): “Item bias is the most extensively studied form of bias and its analysis is conducted to establish scalar invariance (see below; van de Vijver & Leung, 2011).”