Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli.

By J. Courcelle, Arkady B. Khodursky, Brian J. Peter, Patrick O. Brown, P. Hanawalt. Genetics, 2001

875 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mechanism of antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticles (2014, background): “coli cells to DNA-damaging or DNA replication-interfering agents, by inducing about 30 different proteins for damage tolerance [31, 32].”
Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises (2008, background): “coli results in upregulation of uvrA and uvrB gene expression, leading to increased concentrations of UvrA and UvrB and proficient GGR of CPD”
Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks (2005, unknown): “The final perturbed gene, ERG11, was ranked 42nd, which is a substantial enrichment over its ranking based on the significance of its expression change alone (it was ranked 2,820 by z-score of expression change; Table 1).”
Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes (2010, background): “While transcriptional regulation is at the heart of the bacterial DNA damage response (called SOS response) (36), there is little evidence of biologically significant transcriptional induction of HR genes by DNA damage in eukaryotes (30, 33, 86).”
Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea. (2011, background): “Interestingly, several toxins in the Type I TA system (SymE, HokE, and TisB) are induced under SOS response (19, 30, 54, 89, 106).”