Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying.

By K. Modecki, Jeannie Minchin, Allen G Harbaugh, N. Guerra, Kevin C. Runions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2014

1,388 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, background): “Smith and Slonje (2010) and Menesini and Nocentini (2009), on the other hand, argued that the repetition criteria does not apply for cyberbullying.”
Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (2015, background): “…in the plethora of perspectives from which cyberbullying is analyzed (Sabella, Patchin, & Hinduja, 2013) and therefore, in the great differences existing between the instruments used (Modecki et al., 2014), this diversity is inherited from traditional bullying measurements (Greif & Furlong, 2006).”
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions (2017, background): “In a recent meta-analysis on bullying and cyberbullying prevalence across contexts (Modecki et al., 2014) with an overall sample of 335,519 youth (12–18 years), the authors estimated a mean prevalence of 35% for traditional bullying (both perpetration and victimisation roles) and 15% for cyberbullyi”