Rethinking gifted education

By James H. Borland. 2003

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cf2d5dcd43631324295b7d9d4fba0c60d389f4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Ann C. Benjamin
2. David Yun Dai
3. D. Feldman

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Cheng
2. Ann C. Benjamin
3. Joan Ann Swanson
4. David Yun Dai
5. D. Feldman

Citations in the corpus

• State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998—2010 (April) (2011, background): “…way we think about the nature of giftedness and talent, and the goals and practices of gifted education, we clearly see debates and tensions alluding to such a “paradigm shift” (e.g., Borland, 2003; Horowitz, Subotnik, & Matthews, 2009; Treffinger & Feldhusen, 1996; see Dai, 2010, for a review).”
• Creativity and education: an American retrospective (2006, background): “Creativity tests today most often help educators place students into special programs when IQ is not decisive (Borland, 2003).”