The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis.

By John L. Campbell, O. K. Pedersen. 2001

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cc85a752a280d96ecf8f7548f33c5ac2cd6fbeb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950 (2007, background): “…experiments and struggles can determine which foreign elements or logics might translate, resonate, fit or take root, creating susceptibilities—or immunities—to neo-liberalism, other external influences and transformation through cross-national diffusion (Djelic 1998; Campbell and Pederson 2001).”
The Secondary Circuit of Capital Reconsidered: Globalization and the U.S. Real Estate Sector1 (2006, background): “…and regulatory actions to produce stable markets, disrupt some kinds economic activity, and create new markets by, for example, subsidizing industries, directing investment, and imposing price controls (for overviews, see Campbell and Pedersen 2001; Campbell 1997; Immergut 1998; Fligstein 1996).”
Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism (2006, unknown): “…I also gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Sven Steinmo that comes by way of our past collaborative work on tax policy+ 1+ See, among others, Campbell and Pedersen 2001; and Simmons, Dobbin, and Garrett this volume+ International Organization 60, Fall 2006, pp+ 847–882 © 2006 by The IO…”
From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over 200 Years of Welfare Debate (2005, background): “Over the past twenty years, “market funda-mentalism” has moved from the margins of debate to become the dominant policy perspective across the global economy (Bourdieu 1998; Campbell and Pedersen 2001; FourcadeGourinchas and Babb 2002; Stiglitz 2002).”
Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector (2009, background): “…can engage in such institutional work by articulating problems and theorizing solutions to those problems (Suchman, 1995; Benford and Snow, 2000; Strang and Bradburn, 2001), by mobilizing their memberships to promulgate these frames (McAdam, McCarthy, and Zald, 1996), and by serving as a social…”
The Historicity of the Neoliberal State (2012, background): “It is not surprising to observe that numerous global analyses of neoliberalism simply do not mention Africa at all (Campbell and Pedersen 2001; Soederberg et al. 2005 quoted in Harrison 2010).”
The New Pension Reform as Global Policy (2005, background): “The new pension reforms are part of a broader ‘neoliberal’ agenda of economic reform that has swept the world since being enacted in Chile and Britain in the 1970s and 1980s (Campbell and Pedersen, 2001).”
An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations (2016, background): “The market logic is believed to contribute to economic and social prosperity with minimal government coercion and constraint, free movement of labor and goods, and absolute right of property ownership (Albert, 1993; Campbell and Pedersen, 2001; Przeworski, 1995).”
Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility (2006, methodology): “Following calls for a rapprochement among these three paradigms (Campbell & Pedersen, 2001; Hirsch & Lounsbury, 1997), this article employs insights from all versions of institutional analysis to show how the likelihood that firms will act in socially responsible ways is institutionally conditioned.”