Fertility, Taxation and Family Policy

By P. Apps, R. Rees. 2004

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c6329ea9657b49dc46ca6ca5e6e57f9c71f82d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Verner
2. Nina Smith
3. Nabanita Datta Gupta
4. Hosny Zoabi
5. Moshe Hazan
6. Oded Galor
7. Luis Angeles

In Gender Studies

1. M. Verner
2. Nina Smith
3. Nabanita Datta Gupta
4. Hosny Zoabi
5. Moshe Hazan

In General Health Professions

1. Hosny Zoabi
2. Moshe Hazan

Citations in the corpus

• Do Highly Educated Women Choose Smaller Families (2015, background): “6 Our findings are related to Apps and Rees (2004) and Attanasio et al. (2008). Attanasio et al. (2008) studied the life-cycle labour supply of three cohorts of American women, born in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s respectively.”
• PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children (2008, background): “Family-friendly policies, however, loosen this trade-off, see Del Boca et al. (2003), and Apps and Rees (2004) .”
• The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: Causal effects of paternity leave (2011, unknown): “There may also be some omitted factors causing the low fertility in more gender egalitarian countries, e.g., that the Nordic countries have low inequality and extensive safety nets, which probably reduce the risks associated with having children (e.g., Apps and Rees 2004).”