A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development

By D. Chan, G. H. Cheng. 2004

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c36912c21cf72be34547bd7dabae62f3dd351f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Liesel L. Sharabi
2. Andrew M. Ledbetter
3. Nancy K. Baym
4. John P. Caughlin
5. Paul Schrodt
6. Tamara D. Afifi
7. Sandra Petronio
8. Sara Docan-Morgan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Andrew M. Ledbetter
2. Liesel L. Sharabi
3. Nancy K. Baym
4. John P. Caughlin
5. Joseph P. Mazer
6. Sandra Petronio
7. Abdullah J. Sultan
8. Bree McEwan

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing Online and Offline Self-Disclosure: A Systematic Review (2012, unknown): “Survey studies, though, compared disclosure depth amongst friends and found greater FTF disclosure, consistent with MRT.(21,22,35) Again, there does not seem to be overwhelming support for 108 NGUYEN ET AL.”
• A Communicative Interdependence Perspective of Close Relationships: The Connections Between Mediated and Unmediated Interactions Matter (2013, background): “…friendships tend to be more intimate than online ones overall, but the differences are smaller in longer term relationships than in newer ones (Chan & Cheng, 2004); and (d) romantic partners who engage in conflict are more likely to use FtF means for integrative or constructive strategies but…”
• TUNES THAT BIND? (2009, background): “Chan and Cheng’s (2004) version of Parks and Roberts’ (1998) 18-item instrument assessed relational development.”