Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: Issues and Possible Answers

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

LGBT Faculty, Research, and Researchers: Risks and Rewards (2008, background): “However, there are safeguards researchers can take to avoid these pitfalls, and increase the credibility of their work (Anastas, 2004; LaSala, 2003; Van Heughten, 2004; Waldrop, 2004).”
Why youth leave care: Understandings of adulthood and transition successes and challenges among youth aging out of child welfare (2011, background): “These presentations served as member checks, confirming the credibility of our understandings and explanations (Anastas, 2004).”
Educators' Perceptions of Collaborative Planning Processes for Students With Disabilities (2009, background): “Existing theory informs the study, but does not control or limit the study--particularly 41 during data collection when the researcher remains open to discovering new ideas and information (Anastas, 2004).”
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger": Survivalist self-reliance as resilience and risk among young adults aging out of foster care (2008, background): “However, it was crucial to the rigor of analysis to introduce alternative critical perspectives beyond our own in order to ensure balanced interpretations and trustworthiness (Anastas, 2004; Crabtree &Miller, 1999; Lincoln, 1998).”