The test of self‐conscious affect: internal structure, differential scales and relationships with long‐term affects

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy (2008, background): “In contrast, guiltproneness has been found to relate to positive characteristics, such as interpersonal skills (Covert et al. 2003), perspective-taking (Leith and Baumeister 1998), anger control (Lutwak et al. 2001) and empathy ( Fontaine et al. 2001 ).”
A Naturalist’s View of Pride (2010, unknown): “Several researchers have addressed the apparently dual-faceted nature of pride by postulating distinct “authentic” and “hubristic” components of the emotion (Lewis, 2000; Tangney et al., 1989; Tracy & Robins, 2004a).”
The Ability to go about Without Shame: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators of Shame and Humiliation (2007, unknown): “However, the extent to which these two concepts are measuring different constructs remains highly controversial (Harder & Zalma, 1990; Cook, 1996; Sabini & Silver, 1997; Fontaine et al., 2001; Claesson & Sohlberg, 2002; Tangney & Dearing, 2002).”
Does the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation (2002, result): “These estimates are rather low, but comparable to those Tangney and her associates have reported (e.g. see Sanftner, Barlow, Marshall, & Tangney, 1995; Tangney, 1996; Tangney et al., 1989).”