Does the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation

By P. Luyten, Johnny Fontaine, J. Corveleyn. 2002

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23570c5dc9f4f911735025c689c61d80502262af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo

In Social Psychology

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo
3. K. Helkama
4. Mia Silfver
5. Eva E. A. Skoe
6. Shalom H. Schwartz
7. Florencia M. Sortheix

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jan-Erik Lönnqvist
2. M. Verkasalo
3. K. Helkama
4. Mia Silfver
5. Eva E. A. Skoe
6. Shalom H. Schwartz
7. Florencia M. Sortheix

Citations in the corpus

• The relation between value priorities and proneness to guilt, shame, and empathy (2008, background): “Several researchers have pointed out that there are also pathological, chronic forms of guilt, as well as adaptive forms of shame, that motivate reparation (Ferguson and Crowley 1997; Eisenberg 2000; Luyten et al. 2002).”