Explaining altruistic behavior in humans
By Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, Ernst Fehr. 2003
1,015 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ba6b4fa72b4809732cf61265088ba9d2e1a9b31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Joseph Henrich
- Peter M. Kappeler
- Ernst Fehr
- Stuart A. West
- C. Schaik
- Andy Gardner
- Samuel Bowles
- Daniel Taylor
In Safety Research
- Ernst Fehr
- Joseph Henrich
- Samuel Bowles
- Herbert Gintis
- Peter M. Kappeler
- C. Schaik
- Daniel Nettle
- Robert Boyd
In Sociology and Political Science
- Joseph Henrich
- Ernst Fehr
- Stuart A. West
- Andy Gardner
- Peter M. Kappeler
- Daniel Nettle
- Samuel Bowles
- Herbert Gintis
Citations in the corpus
- Normative Bias and Adaptive Challenges: A Relational Approach to Coalitional Psychology and a Critique of Terror Management Theory (2005, background): “…that, because actions entail costs (in the form of time, attention, energy, exposure to risk, or loss of opportunities to engage in alternate actions), evolution will only favor the propensity to act in a given fashion when, in general, such a propensity generates benefits that exceed its costs.”
- Walking Inside the Potential Tax Evader’s Mind: Tax Morale Does Matter (2005, background): “(Buchanan 1995; Gintis et al. 2003; Torgler and Werner 2005; Alm and Torgler 2006).”
- Individual and cultural learning in stag hunt games with multiple actions (2010, background): “Neither the predatory action nor the self interested action aids the cooperative efforts of other players, but unlike the predatory action, the self interested one does not undermine the success of anybody who is trying to cooperate.”
- Game Theory of Mind (2008, neutral): “, [33,34]).”
- Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, neutral): “…biological or cultural selection) if they are responsive to the specific interactive strategies and prospects of social partners and if they take into account reputational consequences and the likelihood of third party punishment (Boyd & Richerson, 1992; Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2003, 2005).”
- Evolution of the social contract (2014, background): “…do this, the numerous economic games that are being played [Fehr et al., 2002, Camerer and Fehr, 2006, Fehr and Schmidt, 1999, Fehr and Gächter, 2002, Gintis et al., 2003, Henrich et al., 2005, Herrmann et al., 2008, Bernhard et al., 2006, Fowler et al., 2005, Egas and Riedl, 2008, Marlowe et…”
- The Evolution of Authoritarian Processes: Fostering Cooperation in Large-Scale Groups (2008, background): “The tendency to punish norm deviants and reward norm compliance corresponds to the strategy of strong reciprocity, that is, to cooperate with and reward cooperators and punish defectors (Gintis et al., 2003).”