Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study

By Dmitry A. Ivanov. International Journal of Production Research, 2018

389 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ba04546074f5655b0dd490dddb3eece1991ff07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case (2020, positive): “3) has been created in the model in line with the study (Ivanov, 2018a) .”
Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study (2020, positive): “…2016; Papadopoulos et al., 2017; Stecke and Kumar, 2009) and the effects of disruptions no longer only affect individual members but tend to spread across the entire network, a phenomenon known as the ripple effect (Dolgui et al., 2018, Dolgui et al., 2020b; Ivanov, 2018a; Pavlov et al., 2019).”
Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience (2018, positive): “The results of a discrete-event simulation study by Ivanov (2017a) showed that the ripple effect enhances the performance impact of disruptions.”
Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda (2021, background): “Simulation: discreteevent simulation Ripple effect– single-multiple sourcing/capacity change Ivanov (2018) The detailed large-scale discrete-event simulation model replicates the supply chain of a smartphone and under the execution of different scenarios it determines the factors that mitigate the…”
Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks (2018, methodology): “Ivanov (2017) examines the intersections between resilience and sustainability in supply chains.”
Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective (2018, background): “Each dimension interacts with the other two, and it is critical not to ignore these interactions as they will cause ripple effects downstream (Ivanov 2017a).”
Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† (2019, methodology): “…propagation in the SC, the resulting SC structural dynamics, and the performance impact of this propagation (Hosseini and Barker 2016; Sokolov et al. 2016; Mizgier 2017; Ivanov 2017a; Dolgui, Ivanov, and Sokolov 2018a; Pavlov et al. 2018; Scheibe and Blackhurst 2018; Ivanov 2018a, 2018b).”
Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model (2023, background): “…recognized by business practitioners and academics as an effective means to guard against disruptions and reduce supply chain vulnerabilities (Ivanov, 2017; Jüttner and Maklan, 2011; Pettit et al., 2013; Queiroz et al., 2022; Ivanov and Das, 2020; Naghshineh and Carvalho, * Corresponding…”
The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics (2018, methodology): “Ivanov (2017) considered a four-stage SC that comprises a man-ufacturer, a central distribution centre, two regional distribution centres and ten customers in different European cities.”
Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature (2018, methodology): “The need for ripple effect analysis in the SC has been recognized and systematically considered in simulation literature with regards to risk analysis, performance impact and resilience assessment (Ivanov 2017a,b).”
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management (2018, background): “2016), material and information flow coordination (Ivanov, Sokolov, and Raguinia 2014), virtual enterprises (Sarkis, Talluri, and Gunasekaran 2007; Crispim and de Sousa 2010), agile supply chain management (Sarkis and Talluri 2001; Cabral, Grilo, and Cruz-Machado 2012), flexibility in supply chains ”
Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, methodology): “• Viability The ability to maintain itself and survive in a changing environment over a long period of time through a redesign of the structures and replanning of economic performance with long-term impacts (Ivanov 2018b, p. 59; Ivanov and Dolgui 2020b).”