Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques

By J. Jesson, L. Matheson, F. Lacey. 2011

875 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b9911a8c769217eeff13f4f9dbc63fece1df352

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews (2015, unknown): “As Jesson et al. (2011) stress, the research questions guide the entire study design because they underscore the type of information that is needed, inform the search for and selection of relevant literature, and guide the subsequent analysis.”
Resilience and household food security: a review of concepts, methodological approaches and empirical evidence (2019, methodology): “To achieve the research objectives, we conducted a systematic literature search (Jesson et al. 2011; Gough et al. 2012) through CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus and Econlit, complemented with a ‘snowball’ in-document reference selection (i.e., identifying relevant articles referenced in other…”
Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research (2018, background): “The thus acquired knowledge base intends to help identify existing research gaps, to determine future research demands and to highlight potential avenues for further research (Booth et al. 2011; Jesson et al. 2011).”
Creating shared value: A systematic review, synthesis and integrative perspective (2021, methodology): “To accomplish this review, we followed a systematic review methodology developed by Jesson et al. (2011).”
Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: a review of empirical research literature (2019, methodology): “The method used drew from methods of systematic review and rapid appraisals (Fukkink and Lont 2007, Jesson et al. 2011, Haby et al. 2016).”
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review (2013, methodology): “The literature review process was conducted in light of the frameworks proposed by Jesson et al. (2011) and Tranfield et al. (2003).”
Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques (2011, background): “Interestingly, the authors declare that when it comes to traditional vs. systematic reviews, they give ‘preference to neither one nor the other, but rather show them as being of equal value but different or sequential process’ (Jesson, Matheson, and Lacey, 2011, p. 24).”
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, methodology): “Methodological pieces on systematic reviews mostly advocate quality assessments based on criteria other than journal rankings (e.g., Booth et al., 2016; Jesson et al., 2011; Petticrew & Roberts, 2012; Tranfield et al., 2003; Williams et al., 2020).”