A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews

By Mathieu Templier, Guy Paré. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2015

518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ba6f8a90843600bd45df1cc1a5f054cc096a16d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. John Krogstie
2. M. Watson
3. Emmanouil Papagiannidis
4. Ida Merete Enholm
5. Patrick Mikalef
6. Yu Xiao

In Management Information Systems

1. Patrick Mikalef
2. John Krogstie
3. M. Watson
4. Emmanouil Papagiannidis
5. Ida Merete Enholm
6. Yu Xiao

Citations in the corpus

• Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review (2021, methodology): “We therefore perform a systematic collection of the extant literature, and put forward a narrative review by summarizing the existing body of literature and providing a comprehensive report which guides future studies (Templier & Paré, 2015).”
• Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “Templier and Paré (2015) recommend using recognized quality assessment tools, for example, checklists, to evaluate research studies.”