Categories and Concepts

By Karin Ackermann. 2003

923 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Thank you for downloading categories and concepts. Maybe you have knowledge that, people have look hundreds times for their chosen novels like this categories and concepts, but end up in malicious downloads. Rather than enjoying a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they are facing with some infectious virus inside their laptop. categories and concepts is available in our book collection an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly. Our book servers spans in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the categories and concepts is universally compatible with any devices to read.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT CATEGORIZATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN: HIERARCHICAL INCLUSIVENESS, AGE, PERCEPTUAL ATTRIBUTE, AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES (2010, background): “Indeed, Smith and Medin (1981) concluded that similarity might be the best general heuristic for determining category membership.”
Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits (2001, background): “model, encoding feature correlations requires linking every feature with every other feature, weighted by the degree of correlation (Smith and Medin, 1981).”
Concept learning in animals. (2008, background): “This generalization decrement can be explained by a host of different theories of conceptual behavior -- from exemplar models to prototype models (Smith & Medin, 1981; also see Astley & Wasserman, 1992).”
Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles (2008, background): “According to the classical view, categories are represented by a set of defining features which are shared by all examples (Klausmeier and Sipple 1980; Smith, Shoben and Rips 1974; Smith and Medin 1981).”
Embodiment in Religious Knowledge (2005, background): “The transduction principle underlies the theories of knowledge that have dominated cognitive science since the cognitive revolution, including semantic networks, feature lists, frames, schemata, and predicate calculus (cf. Barsalou & Hale, 1993; Smith & Medin, 1981).”
The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property norms (2013, neutral): “…individuality of objects and their relationship to one another (Cree, McNorgan, & McRae, 2006; Hampton, 1979; McRae, Cree, Westmacott, & de Sa, 1999; McRae, de Sa, & Seidenberg, 1997; Moss, Tyler, & Jennings, 1997; Rosch, 1975; Smith & Medin, 1981; Taylor, Moss, & Tyler, 2007; Tyler & Moss, 2001).”
Evolution and Devolution of Knowledge: A Tale of Two Biologies (2004, background): “One classic finding in cognitive psychology is that some category members are better examples than others and that goodness-of-example ratings are based on central tendency (Smith & Medin 1981).”
Product Complements and Substitutes in the Real World: The Relevance of “Other Products” (2004, background): “The psychology and consumer behavior literature has examined cognitive representations of categories and their ensuing information-processing implications (e.g., Alba and Hutchinson 1987; Barsalou 1991; Murphy and Medin 1985; Rosch 1978; Smith and Medin 1981; Viswanathan and Childers 1999).”
Instance-Based Learning Algorithms (1991, methodology): “The design of IBL algorithms was also inspired by exemplar-based models of categorization (Smith & Medin, 1981).”
Experience-Based and On-Line Categorization of Objects in Early Infancy (2010, background): “Categories mediate our interactions with the world in many ways (Bornstein, 1984; Harnad, 1987; Rakison & Oakes, 2003; Rosch, 1975; Smith & Medin, 1981; Smith, 1989).”
Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes (2012, background): “As in the case of inter-level attributes, second-order interaction features are also characteristic in that they are not defining (Smith & Medin, 1981), again meaning that not all processes must exhibit all of these features.”