Differential Validity and Prediction of the SAT

By K. Mattern, Brian F. Patterson, Emily J. Shaw, J. Kobrin, Sandra M. Barbuti. 2008

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b04f59950f9eeee6f105f86ea086e65b6d573bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Santelices
2. Reynol Junco

Citations in the corpus

• Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning (2010, result): “These results likely hold for current test forms, because the changes made to the SAT verbal and math sections in 2005 were minor and revisions centered on the introduction of a writing test (Mattern et al., 2008).”