Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement

By C. Wickens. Hum. Factors, 2008

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eye Movements as an Indicator of Situation Awareness in a Flight Simulator Experiment (2012, background): “The differences among these three stages are important because they point to differences in perceptual and cognitive processes that range from low-level perceptual processes (Level 1) to higher level cognitive processes (Levels 2 and 3; Wickens, 2008 ).”
Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings (2015, methodology): “The Endsley 1995 Model has generally been considered one of the most extensive and highly cited models of SA (Golightly, Wilson, Lowe, & Sharples, 2010; Wickens, 2008).”
Prediction in Situation Awareness: Confidence Bias and Underlying Cognitive Abilities (2011, background): “Two aspects of Endsley's treatment deserve emphasis (see also Wickens, 2008 ).”
Is situation awareness all in the mind? (2010, background): “As Wickens ( 2008 ) points out, advances in science can only occur in light of vigorous debate.”
Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation (2014, background): “The hypothetical trade-offs depicted in Figure 2 are critical for task allocation because these trade-offs may not be linear, and in some cases a “flat” function may allow strong recommendations for the optimal task allocation (Wickens, 2008a).”